NOT KNOWN FACTS ABOUT H4831 VS H4831SC

Not known Facts About h4831 vs h4831sc

Not known Facts About h4831 vs h4831sc

Blog Article

I picked up a 50ct. box of one hundred sixty Nosler Accubonds, but I am hesitant to burn the powder and projectiles on workup when all I have is fifty bullets. But I really want to find a bullet in the 160 course that my more mature rifle likes.

H4831SC Powder accessible in stock now. Ballistically, this Extraordinary Extruded powder is the exact copy of H4831. Physically, it's a shorter grain size, for that reason, the designation SC or shorter Reduce. The shorter, far more compact kernels allow the powder to circulation in the powder measures a lot more easily, assisting to alleviate the regular cutting of granules.

The reality that the H4831 is indeed a slower burning powder is precisely why you're looking at larger velocities obtained with that powder, versus what you've noticed Using the IMR stuff. Also superior powder, but considerably better suited to slightly lesser cases which has a little bit much less capability.

Caution employing SC or SSC formulated loads with long Minimize, again off and work up. Use Secure loading strategies.

Alaska The sc loads up a little better but They're the very same issue, 1 is just quick Slash. I’ve even mixed the conventional one Along with the SC and gotten a similar outcomes as working with one or another.

Any load data to support that? My initially believed is it's actually not going to burn up all the way and velocities will likely be gradual and everywhere. May very well be a nice fireworks Display screen!

Anybody loading 7mm Rem Mag with H4831sc? How are the final results, any data it is possible to share? Should also mention I have some ELD-X one hundred seventy five's I would want to examination out, if you have details on that also.

While this might be legitimate, there's a good deal more to it than simply not blowing yourself up. He could not hit prairie dogs over and above about a h4831sc load data hundred and fifty yards, so I'm guessing that inconsistent combustion was not carrying out everything favorable for his grouping skill with Individuals loads.

The main reason I switched from IMR 4831 to H4831 was to take advantage of the temperature insensitivity of a Hodgdon Severe powder.

The h4831sc 55grs is all of that I shoot from my swift. Other manuals I feel that they've slowed down the swift to indicate that their rifles are much better. It bug the hell from me. I'm sure far better. That is why I don't at any time toss out my older manuals. I do invest in new manual on a regular basis to remain up on new chambers and there loading. I take advantage of this 39grs in summers @ 100+ degrees without any troubles.

This really is an older thread, you might not receive a reaction, and will be reviving an outdated thread. Please contemplate developing a new thread.

I use 52 grs H4831sc which has a 117gr Hornady BTSP. It really is precise, mild mannered, and knocks whitetails down DRT. If it was me, I might get started at 52 gr and perform up.

I commonly normally obtain the sc version. Using a powder evaluate it hangs up a lot less due to shorter kernels and I believe permits much more steady metering so significantly less time you're taking trickling in the final little bit of charge to make body weight. So in essence h4831sc load data the SC saves you moments

If I've a pound or two of a powder and get far more of a similar, only a unique whole lot selection, I will mix them all up in order that I have a homogeneous batch of powder with which to operate.

Report this page